Comments on: C/C++ http://blog.prelode.com/2007/02/cc/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=cc On Prelode's development.. once it begins, anyway.. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:41:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: anon http://blog.prelode.com/2007/02/cc/comment-page-1/#comment-6961 anon Tue, 29 May 2007 00:41:38 +0000 http://blog.prelode.com/?p=56#comment-6961 Ah. Nevermind. Ah. Nevermind.

]]> By: anon http://blog.prelode.com/2007/02/cc/comment-page-1/#comment-6959 anon Tue, 29 May 2007 00:41:01 +0000 http://blog.prelode.com/?p=56#comment-6959 I think they write it like that cause so much of C++ is wrapping the functional APIs from C ^^;; @jeba: Shouldn't that have been c--? Otherwise, I get a compiler error.... I think they write it like that cause so much of C++ is wrapping the functional APIs from C ^^;;

@jeba:
Shouldn’t that have been c–? Otherwise, I get a compiler error….

]]> By: jeba http://blog.prelode.com/2007/02/cc/comment-page-1/#comment-3727 jeba Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:10:03 +0000 http://blog.prelode.com/?p=56#comment-3727 you're fucking stupid. c++ gets a bad name? c++ should be named c--. you’re fucking stupid.
c++ gets a bad name?
c++ should be named c–.

]]> By: Sadiq http://blog.prelode.com/2007/02/cc/comment-page-1/#comment-3446 Sadiq Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:19:54 +0000 http://blog.prelode.com/?p=56#comment-3446 omg. Boost. omg. Boost.

]]>